Systematic enumeration of mathematical, mechanical, and inference breaks evaluated under the Nine Rules of Ontological and Epistemic Governance.
Every claimed process must specify a mechanism
Every entity must have defined creation, persistence, and termination
Exceptions must not be disguised as features
Sufficient conditions must not be conflated with necessary ones
Mathematical descriptors must not be reified as causal agents
Claims must remain consistent across valid transformations
Theoretical interpretations must not be stated as established facts
All implications must be traceable to verified premises
Systematic omissions within stated scope are false by omission